Kahlil Gibran, a Lebanese poet who lived around the turn of the last century, once wrote, “You give but little when you give of your possessions. It is when you give of yourself that you truly give.” This has been on my mind much over the past year with natural disasters and human suffering on an unprecedented scale around the globe.

I read not long ago a call for all good Christians to support higher taxes so government could do more to help the poor and needy. It disturbed me that someone would appeal to my religious beliefs to support increased government “charity.” Is that really what charity is? While most religions teach that we have an obligation to care for one another, government bureaucracy should not be what first comes to mind when considering that responsibility.

Taxes are not charity. They are coerced and not freely given. I am not saying that there is no place for government in helping to relieve human suffering. We rightfully expect our public officials to warn us of impending danger whenever possible and give us life-saving advice. We must be able to count on our police and fire departments and, on occasion, our national guard troops, to protect us from danger and keep the peace. Our transportation departments, weather centers, and other similar agencies, both local and state, provide valuable services.

However, when we speak of true charity – feeding and clothing the needy, providing shelter, encouragement, and a hundred other necessities – that is not the business of government. That role is best filled by private entities and individuals. Government, by its very nature, is unsuited to the work of charity. It is intentionally burdensome, slow to change and react. As inconvenient as this may be in today’s world of instant messaging, instant gratification, instant everything, it is a safeguard which makes government less susceptible to the whims of society. Government’s role, then, in the work of charity should be that of providing an environment which allows, even encourages and rewards, the charitable efforts of private entities and individuals.

Davy Crockett – frontiersman, soldier, politician, American hero – struggled to define the role of government in charitable acts. As a member of Congress, a bill came before the body appropriating money for the benefit of the widow of a distinguished naval officer. Many eloquent speeches were given in favor of this bill and, until Davy Crockett rose to speak, the passage of this bill was assured. He said, in part, “I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money.” He then issued a challenge to each member of Congress to follow his example and donate one week’s wages to the benefit of this poor widow. Not one man responded to his proposition and the bill was soundly defeated. The principle he fought for was learned many years earlier from a constituent who, in response to a similar bill passed for the benefit of refugees from a large fire in Washington, called attention to the fact that nowhere in the Constitution does it give Congress the authority to give away public money for charity. It was a lesson well learned by Davy Crockett, and hopefully by us as well. For a full text of the story click here.

The problem with government assistance is that the only thing they really have to offer is money. By contrast, charities like the Red Cross, Salvation Army and religious organizations, for which I have gained a new appreciation, provide hands-on, person-to-person, basic services. All charitable organizations have overhead costs, but reputable charities keep them to a minimum and encourage volunteerism to minimize labor costs. The Red Cross alone in just the past month has raised over a billion dollars which will be used not only to meet immediate needs, but also to train volunteers and purchase equipment to handle future emergencies.

In television coverage of the aftermath of Hurricane Rita, a reporter commented on the citizens of rural Louisiana and Texas saying something to the effect, “They were mostly farmers, shrimpers, ranchers, outdoors people. They know how to make do with very little. They’re not waiting for FEMA, they’re just getting on with their lives”. I drove past Thistle the other day and thought of those days, over 20 years ago, when neighbor helped neighbor to move personal belongings and save what could be saved before the flood waters took it all. Exactly the same thing happened this past January with the flooding in St. George and Cedar Hills. Probably, many of us remember the Teton Dam flood which obliterated a large swath of south-eastern Idaho. Many from all over our area were called on to travel to Rexburg and surrounding areas to help in the cleanup efforts.

There is much we can do, for ourselves and for others, without relying on government. Some erroneously believe their individual donation, whether of money or time, could not possibly make a difference. But, it is there, in the giving and receiving, that we find our humanity. I believe that it strengthens us as individuals and strengthens our community.

It is my hope and prayer is that we as citizens of this beautiful community and this great state and nation will continue to be actively involved in charitable donations of time and means and not passively stand by waiting for government to fill that role. Surely, the consequences of such selflessness will be the blessings of heaven for ourselves and those we touch, and also allowing and encouraging government to once again assume their proper role.

We at the American Health Care Academy take pride in offering to you professional online CPR certification classes. All of our instructors are certified, provide exceptional services, and are always accessible to every client. Likewise, our online CPR classes offer an alternative training venue for those who have a hectic schedule. High quality instruction is provided using the strictest of guidelines, the highest standards, and are up-to-date with the latest regulations including the ECC 2005 standards.

The classes offered by the American Health Care Academy are acknowledged and accepted by nursing homes, hospitals, schools, government organizations, and countless other institutions or organizations that require First Aid and CPR/AED certifications.

Our certified instructors are professionals in the field. They have extensive knowledge of the methods and techniques of CPR/AED and First Aid, both through rigorous training as well as real life situations. They come from all walks of life and work in a host of health or public service careers. They are also trained through the American Heart Association and the American Red Cross. Curriculums are based on the guidelines of these two organizations. Collectively, the abundance of wisdom and practical applications provided by these instructors cannot be found anywhere else on the internet!

The most amazing fact about our instruction process lies in the ability to study at your own pace. Depending upon the chosen course, full instruction may last from one to three hours. Students can choose to complete training all at once, or they may log in and out as often as they wish for up to sixty days. All instructional materials are made available to the students during this time period. The instructors are also available during this time to offer any clarifications or to answer any questions.

The American Health Care Academy can be found at their website: www.cpraedcourse.com

All those who have been to CPR classes will know the basics to mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. You start by checking if the patients airway is clear, then you check the patients breathing, then you check for heartbeat and if, during this process, the patient suddenly awakens, ensure that you are not bitten.

For quite a while now the American Red Cross and other organizations have been training people in performing CPR for pets through classes which include all the nuances of first aid for pets inclusive of mouth-to-snout resuscitation. That’s correct, mouth-to-snout.

This technique is very similar to the conventional mouth-to-mouth resuscitation for humans. The main difference is that the person while performing this will close the mouth of the dog and provide breaths into the nose of the dog. Though this sounds humorous and to some even unpleasant, knowing the mouth-to-snout resuscitation technique can even save your pets life if it ever came to that.

The Scoop is a popular website that reports news on dogs (you know what the theory is -’dog bites man’ is no news but ‘man bites dog’ definitely is). In March 2002, they came out with a story about a man in Walla Walla who saved a dog from death by performing the mouth-to-snout resuscitation. The dog had accidentally choked and had it not been for the Good Samaritan, who had received training in this process, the dog would have surely died. The Associated Veterinary Clinic of Walla Walla then treated the revived dog and released it.

Mouth to snout is not the only procedure that can be performed on dogs. In case of emergencies where the dogs heart stops, chest compressions can also be performed. Awareness about these procedures can perhaps save a dogs from death and allow him to live and play another day of fetch.

Many organizations, which previously provided training and certification in traditional CPR only, are now teaching pet CPR too and the concept is fast gaining popularity. The Red Cross in your locality may be conducting these classes and if you are interested in training you must contact them. You never know when such expertise may come to use.